Time to teach, Part 2
Wow. I got a lot of insightful response very quickly on this new advertising curriculum I'm trying to develop for MCAD. (Check out the comments.) Thanks to everyone for responding thus far!
I thought I'd share an especially interesting email response from Edward Boches, Chief Creative Officer of Mullen. Edward's not on Twitter, not on Facebook. But he's been in the trenches of trying to figure out how a large, national agency should evolve and adapt to what Lebowski might refer to as "the new shit." So I found his comments particularly intriguing.
Edward's email...
Tim:
I think what youâre doing is great. A few initial thoughts.
Too much of digital creative is often influenced by what can be done digitally as opposed to what does a client need to accomplish (awareness, transaction, loyalty, building advocates, sharing common beliefs). So one thing to think about is how to distinguish what one kind of company or brand should do digitally
vs another. Not everyone should send out messages to a cell phone. (Certainly a mobile company with a new plan or lower rates should.) Can you get people to think about how to apply digital possibilities to a specific problem/opportunity and look at the world from the specific business objectives/needs of the client. What does digital mean to Porsche vs Ben and Jerryâs vs Terminex.2. Not a criticism, but a thought: your current definition of integration is more what I would consider a definition of consistency. Letâs take our idea and express it in all the different media. I believe the true future opportunity is to conceive ideas that couldnât even exist if it werenât for their ability to employ different digital media to make the idea possible. Dove gets close. Maybe Axe. But the fact is neither is as big as the future. I once had an idea for XM that tapped into the fact that they recorded hundreds of bands in their studio every year. What if each band recorded the same song and then users could go online and pick different vocalists, guitarists, base players, etc and mix their own version of the song, download it, share it, etc. What is that? An application, an ad idea, a community idea, a brand idea? Whatever it is, it couldnât happen without advertising to promote it, the web to share it, technology to play with it, and a core brand passion (music) to inspire it.
3. I hope a few years from now the ideal agency will have but four departments. Strategy. Channels. Content. Production. You wonât be able to conceive an idea or a program without one person from each group in the room. Strategy: What are we trying to do and to whom are we talking. Channels: How do we connect, inspire, engage and interact. Content: What do we create (or get them to create.) Production: How do we produce it timely and efficiently. Ideally, the channel and the technology inherent in that channel will inspire creative execution as much as a strategy brief will. Production techniques, whether for ipods, cell phone, the web, digital billboards, etc. will be equally influential in driving a creative idea.
The challenge is that we will need strategists who can think across disciplines, channel (media) people who are technologically tuned in, production people who know how to maximize assets and steer creative based on how/where the assets will be used, and creative people who are comfortable in all of these areas.
So how do you teach a course? Can you get anyone to learn all of these things? Or rather can you simply get them to understand that this is what they have to think about, incorporate into their specific area of focus, or simply be aware of to make something great that will work in the marketplace on a consumerâs terms?
Hope this helps. Let me know.
Edward
Thanks so much for the insights, Edward! I'm particularly drawn to the ideas in point #3. It's simple, easy to understand, it would appear to be "implementable" within the framework of most large, traditional agencies. Though, I suspect the challenge (as Armano put it recently), would be in terms of empathy and passion for the new direction.
Please keep the comments rolling. I hope to unveil some course description ideas and course outlines early next week for further feedback.
- - - - -
UPDATE: Here's a third post on this subject. And thanks to all who've responded thus far!
And a fourth post with course title, description and objectives.